<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' version='2.0'><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37782502</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:34:40 +0000</lastBuildDate><title>Scratch Pad</title><description/><link>http://www.lavalane.org/scratch/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Bradley Ross)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>43</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37782502.post-7199856793128932483</guid><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:24:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-08-16T18:48:43.500-06:00</atom:updated><title>Reasons I'm Uncomfortable with John McCain</title><description>John McCain sponsored the McCain-Feingold legislation that prohibits many forms of political speech. I think this is an affront to liberty.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He seems to have a quite immoral past. I don't have any reason to believe he isn't faithful to Cindy, but I'd like to have a leader that is trying to be righteous. I don't know if that is a goal of John McCain's.</description><link>http://www.lavalane.org/scratch/2008/08/reasons-im-uncomfortable-with-john.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Bradley Ross)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37782502.post-2803604652630983917</guid><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 17:41:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-08-18T19:55:48.208-06:00</atom:updated><title>Reasons I'm Uncomfortable with Barack Obama</title><description>[I'm updating this post continually, so the original publication date isn't entirely accurate.]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Single-issue voting isn't healthy. It encourages wedge issue thinking and closed-mindedness. I think party platforms are a great place to &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;start&lt;/span&gt; in understanding a candidates views. I don't think our evaluation of the candidates should end with the party platform. I'm keeping an ongoing list in this post of issues that make me uncomfortable with Barack Obama as our country's president. We'll weigh the positives and negatives of each candidates and then we can make a more informed decision.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121261107480446197.html"&gt;Obama's voting record (extreme pro-abortion) doesn't jive with his rhetoric (moderation in abortion policy) &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;As an Illinois state senator, Barack Obama twice opposed legislation to define as "persons" babies who survive late-term abortions. Babies like Gianna. Mr. Obama said in a speech on the Illinois Senate floor that he could not accept that babies wholly emerged from their mother's wombs are "persons," and thus deserving of equal protection under the Constitution's 14th Amendment.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Obama has since argued that he had legitimate reasons for voting against that legislation, but his assertion &lt;a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NmUzZmY2ZGU0YzJiNjgxMmUwYjQ4YTI5MDZiOTQ3ZWU="&gt;has&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MzNjMjA3NDg1NzIwY2JiNTE4NTI3M2ZkYjJjMmIxZTY="&gt;been&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=N2NmMGNkMTdkZWJkZWRkMjRkNjY5NjllNzZlYjkyNmY=&amp;amp;w=MQ=="&gt;disproved&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.barackobama.com/2007/07/20/obama_dont_stay_in_iraq_over_g.php"&gt;Obama's position on Iraq is irresponsible. He seems unwilling to own the current situation on the ground and instead argue about what we should have done.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama said Thursday the United States cannot use its military to solve humanitarian problems and that preventing a potential genocide in Iraq isn't a good enough reason to keep U.S. forces there.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/article_print/SB120585801828545495.html"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Affiliation with a church for apparently political purposes, exposing his children to blatant racism in a time when healing is needed. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Obama hasn't thrown himself fully into anything. I wonder if he's an "idea person" without the ability to see things through to completion. &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/05/opinion/05brooks.html?_r=1&amp;amp;oref=slogin"&gt;David Brooks elaborates on the difficulty in placing him in any community of practice.&lt;/a&gt; He was a law professor who was liked by students, but who never produced scholarship nor engaged with the other faculty. &lt;a href="http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/obama/1050869,CST-NWS-garden11.article"&gt;He was a community organizer&lt;/a&gt; who had ideas about improvement, but didn't stick around long enough to see them through. He joined a church for political reasons, never really became a part of that community, and then abandoned it when higher political aspirations beckoned. He skipped through the state legislature without really getting into it. His career in the US Senate was nothing more than a stepping stone to the presidency. He hasn't really engaged with his colleagues there on either side of the aisle save a handful.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By his own standard of judgment, Obama lacks sufficient experience for a high and responsible post. When &lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121901817146948231.html?mod=opinion_main_review_and_outlooks"&gt;asked about Supreme Court justices&lt;/a&gt;, Obama singled out Justice Thomas. He said, "I would not have nominated Clarence Thomas. I don't think that he, I don't think that he was a strong enough jurist or legal thinker at the time for that elevation." The Wall Street Journal editorial board responds to the accusation of insufficient experience.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;So let's see. By the time he was nominated, Clarence Thomas had worked in the Missouri Attorney General's office, served as an Assistant Secretary of Education, run the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and sat for a year on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, the nation's second most prominent court. Since his "elevation" to the High Court in 1991, he has also shown himself to be a principled and scholarly jurist.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;They sum it up by noting, "Justice Thomas's judicial credentials compare favorably to Mr. Obama's Presidential résumé by any measure."</description><link>http://www.lavalane.org/scratch/2008/07/reasons-im-uncomfortable-with-barack.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Bradley Ross)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37782502.post-7270708606048534889</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 21:03:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-03-27T15:04:15.881-06:00</atom:updated><title>Utah Election 08 Resources</title><description>&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;US House District 3 Race&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.heraldextra.com/component/option,com_wrapper/Itemid,165/"&gt;A telephone debate between the candidates&lt;/a&gt;. Actually, more of a collection of sound bites from each candidate.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;</description><link>http://www.lavalane.org/scratch/2008/03/utah-election-08-resources.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Bradley Ross)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37782502.post-8415285726282233353</guid><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 02:17:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-03-18T20:17:40.857-06:00</atom:updated><title>Fun Links</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THdf6icITis"&gt;Spontaneous Mall Musical&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://www.lavalane.org/scratch/2008/03/fun-links.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Keryn)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37782502.post-7300737862621961440</guid><pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-03-19T23:04:49.852-06:00</atom:updated><title>Barack Obama</title><description>On the Wright controversy:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/03/020029.php"&gt;Video (and commentary) from a sermon Rev. Wright gave at Christmas 2007 (Powerline Blog)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120545277093135111.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries"&gt;Commentary on other Wright inflammatory rhetoric from the WSJ&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MjRiZTVkMjcyNjIxNzRiYmUyMTgyYTEzYTE4ZjZjYzE="&gt;Victor Davis Hanson discusses Rev. Wright's extremism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NDMxYjEyZTJlODI0MzJiMzQzNjY5MzI3NWI4NDZjOWE="&gt;VDH part II&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=Y2ZlM2ZmY2UwNWNkMzIxZGRhOWM3YjVkZWI5MzkzZjI="&gt;VDH part III&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_031308/content/01125106.guest.html"&gt;Rush Limbaugh with more clips from Rev. Wright &lt;/a&gt;(from the 2007 speech, a 2003 speech, and a 2001 speech)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/xpress/richardminiter/2008/03/14/in_defense_of_obamas_pastor.php"&gt;Richard Minitier&lt;/a&gt; discusses why Rev. Wright's rhetoric isn't any different than many other black churches&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/barack-obama/on-my-faith-and-my-church_b_91623.html"&gt;Barack Obama denounces Rev. Wright's&lt;/a&gt; inflammatory sermons, announces he didn't know about them, and removes Rev. Wright from his advisory council&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Victor Davis Hanson on &lt;a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ODRiMDFlMjNlNmUyYjMyZjM5OWU5ZWM1N2VlOTJmZjQ="&gt;Wright, Obama, and Don Imus&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;If we don't expect Barack Obama to denounce the radical views of his pastor, then how can we expect moderate Muslims to &lt;a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZjU2Y2RiZDhkZDA4MmNkMGQwZGMxOWI3ZDJmZmM3MzE="&gt;denounce radical imans and mosques&lt;/a&gt;?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;</description><link>http://www.lavalane.org/scratch/2008/03/barack-obama.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Keryn)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37782502.post-8761149721579653340</guid><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-02-09T22:54:28.723-07:00</atom:updated><title>Global warming winter 2008</title><description>From &lt;a href="http://en.rian.ru/analysis/20080103/94768732.html"&gt;RIA Novosti, Oleg Sorokhtin&lt;/a&gt; writes:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Astrophysics knows two solar activity cycles, of 11 and 200 years. Both are caused by changes in the radius and area of the irradiating solar surface. The latest data, obtained by Habibullah Abdusamatov, head of the Pulkovo Observatory space research laboratory, say that Earth has passed the peak of its warmer period, and a fairly cold spell will set in quite soon, by 2012. Real cold will come when solar activity reaches its minimum, by 2041, and will last for 50-60 years or even longer.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Take it with a grain of salt, but the basic science seems on the ball to me.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;From &lt;a href="http://ibdeditorial.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=287279412587175"&gt;Investor's Business Daily&lt;/a&gt;, more about sunspots: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;This solar hibernation corresponded with a period of bitter cold that began around 1650 and lasted, with intermittent spikes of warming, until 1715. Frigid winters and cold summers during that period led to massive crop failures, famine and death in Northern Europe.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Tapping reports no change in the sun's magnetic field so far this cycle and warns that if the sun remains quiet for another year or two, it may indicate a repeat of that period of drastic cooling of the Earth, bringing massive snowfall and severe weather to the Northern Hemisphere.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://www.lavalane.org/scratch/2008/01/global-warming-winter-2008.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Keryn)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37782502.post-2622563216880673162</guid><pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 01:21:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-10-06T19:52:18.102-06:00</atom:updated><title>U of A Recommended Reading</title><description>From a list given to Bradley while in high school in Page, Arizona.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Achebe:  Things Fall Apart&lt;br /&gt;Aesop:  Fables&lt;br /&gt;Agee:  A Death in the Family&lt;br /&gt;Anaya:  Bless me, Ultima&lt;br /&gt;Anderson:  Winesburg, Ohio&lt;br /&gt;Austin:  Pride and Prejudice&lt;br /&gt;Baldwin:  Notes to a Native Son&lt;br /&gt;Bellow:  Henderson the Ram King; Mr. Sammler's Planet&lt;br /&gt;*:  Bible&lt;br /&gt;Borges:  Dr. Brodie's Report&lt;br /&gt;Boswell:  Life of Johnson&lt;br /&gt;Bronte, C:  Jane Eyre&lt;br /&gt;Bronte, E:  Wuthering Heights&lt;br /&gt;Buck:  The Good Earth&lt;br /&gt;Capote:  In Cold Blood, The Grass Harp, and other short stories&lt;br /&gt;Carson:  The Sea Around Us&lt;br /&gt;Carroll:  Alice in Wonderland&lt;br /&gt;Cather:  Death comes to the Archbishop&lt;br /&gt;Cervantes:  Don Quixote&lt;br /&gt;Chaucer:  Canterbury Tales&lt;br /&gt;Conrad:  Heath of Darkness, the Secret Sharer&lt;br /&gt;Cooper:  last of the Mohicans&lt;br /&gt;Crane:  The Red Badge of Courage&lt;br /&gt;Dante:  The Divine Comedy&lt;br /&gt;Dickens:  David Copperfield; Great Expectations; Oliver Twist; Tale of Two Cities&lt;br /&gt;Dickenson:  Collected poems&lt;br /&gt;Dostsyevsky:  Crime and Punishment&lt;br /&gt;Elliot, George:  Adam Bede&lt;br /&gt;Elliot, T.S.:  Collected Verse:  Murder in the Cathedral&lt;br /&gt;Ellsion:  Invisible Man&lt;br /&gt;Emerson:  Essays&lt;br /&gt;Euripedes:  Medea&lt;br /&gt;Faulkner:  The Bear:  The unvanquished&lt;br /&gt;Fitzgerald:  The Great Gatsby&lt;br /&gt;Franklin:  Autobiography&lt;br /&gt;Frost:  Collected Poems&lt;br /&gt;Gaines:  The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman&lt;br /&gt;Goldsmith:  She Stoops to Conquer&lt;br /&gt;Grimm:  Household Tales&lt;br /&gt;Hardy:  Tess of the D'Urbervilles, Return of the Native&lt;br /&gt;Hawthorne:  The House of the Seven Gables, The Scarlet Letter&lt;br /&gt;Hemingway:  For Whom the Bell Tolls, The Old man and the Sea, A Farewell to Arms&lt;br /&gt;Homer:  Iliad, Odyseey&lt;br /&gt;Huxley:  Brave New World&lt;br /&gt;Isben:  A Doll's House, Enemy of the People&lt;br /&gt;James:  The Turn of the Screw, Portrait of a Lady&lt;br /&gt;Kipling:  Jungle Books, Kim, Captain Courageous&lt;br /&gt;Lewis, C.S.:  The Chronicles of Narnia, Out of the Silent Planet&lt;br /&gt;Lewis, Oscar:  The Children of Sanchez&lt;br /&gt;Lewis, Sinclair:  Babbitt, Arrowsmith&lt;br /&gt;London:  Call of the Wild&lt;br /&gt;Marquez:  One Hundred Years of Solitude&lt;br /&gt;McCullers:  Member of the Wedding, The Heart is a Lonely Hunter&lt;br /&gt;Melville:  Moby Dick, Billy Budd&lt;br /&gt;Millay:  Collected Poems&lt;br /&gt;Miller:  Death of a Salesman, The Crucible&lt;br /&gt;Milton:  Paradise Lost&lt;br /&gt;Mishima:  The Sound of Waves&lt;br /&gt;Mitford:  American Way of Death&lt;br /&gt;Momday:  House Made of Dawn, The Way to Rainy Mountain&lt;br /&gt;Morehead:  The Blue Nile, The White Nile&lt;br /&gt;Murasaki:  Tale of Genji&lt;br /&gt;O'Neill:  Emperor Jones, Beyond the Horizon&lt;br /&gt;Orwell:  1984, Animal Farm&lt;br /&gt;Paton:  Cry, the Beloved Country&lt;br /&gt;Plath:  The Bell Jar&lt;br /&gt;Poe:  Tales&lt;br /&gt;Polo:  Travels of Marco Polo&lt;br /&gt;Plutarch:  Lives of the Caesars&lt;br /&gt;Riesman:  The Lonely Crowd&lt;br /&gt;Rivera:  "..and the earth did not part."&lt;br /&gt;Roth:  Call It Sleep&lt;br /&gt;Sagan:  Dragons of Eden&lt;br /&gt;Salinger:  Catcher in the Rye&lt;br /&gt;Sandburg:  Lincoln&lt;br /&gt;Saroyan:  The Human Comedy&lt;br /&gt;Sekaquaptewa, H.:  Me and Mine&lt;br /&gt;Shakespeare:  Romeo and Juliet, Macbeth, Julius Caesar, Hamlet, Merchant of Venice, Midsummer Night's Dream&lt;br /&gt;Shaw:  Pygmalion, Saint Joan&lt;br /&gt;Singer:  Gimpei the Fool and other stories&lt;br /&gt;Sophocles:  Oedipus Rex, Antigone&lt;br /&gt;Sheridan:  The Rivals&lt;br /&gt;Solzhenitsya:  One Day in the Life of Ivan Devnisovich&lt;br /&gt;Steinbeck:  The Grapes of Wrath&lt;br /&gt;Stevens:  Collected Poems&lt;br /&gt;Stevenson:  Treasure Island, Kidnapped&lt;br /&gt;Strachey:  Victoria&lt;br /&gt;Swift:  Gulliver's Travels&lt;br /&gt;Thacheay:  Vanity Fair&lt;br /&gt;Thorau:  Walden&lt;br /&gt;Tolkien:  Lord of the Rings&lt;br /&gt;Tolstoy:  War and Peace&lt;br /&gt;Tuchman:  The guns of August, The Distant Mirror&lt;br /&gt;Twain:  Huckleberry Finn, Tom sawyer&lt;br /&gt;Virgil:  Aeneid&lt;br /&gt;Welty:  Collected Stories&lt;br /&gt;Wharton:  Ethan Frome&lt;br /&gt;White, T.H.:  The Once and Future King&lt;br /&gt;Whitman:  Leaves of Grass&lt;br /&gt;Whittier:  Selected Poems&lt;br /&gt;Wilder:  Our Town, The Skin of Our Teeth&lt;br /&gt;Williams:  The Glass Menagerie</description><link>http://www.lavalane.org/scratch/2007/10/u-of-recommended-reading.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Keryn)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37782502.post-5777106443575170266</guid><pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 01:32:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-10-02T19:35:28.453-06:00</atom:updated><title>Boo for Yahoo</title><description>I was looking at the &lt;a href="http://kids.yahoo.com/"&gt;Yahoo Kids&lt;/a&gt; site today and left annoyed. I sent the following letter on their feedback form.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I visited the site to check out the possibility of letting my kids hang out here. The answer will be no. The front page of your site featured a music video from the "Naked Brothers Band." That the incongruity of the band's name didn't leap out at the editors leaves me with no trust in the rest of your site. The LAST thing I want to teach my children on the internet is that it might be okay to click on a naked-anything link. /smacks forehead&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;P.S. Yes, I watched the video and I realize it doesn't contain pornographic content. The point is the false association with risque titles and innocent content. &lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><link>http://www.lavalane.org/scratch/2007/10/boo-for-yahoo.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Bradley Ross)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37782502.post-774321266470371014</guid><pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 00:48:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-02-27T11:39:28.209-07:00</atom:updated><title>My latex-free boy</title><description>Our son has a heightened chance of developing a latex allergy (he has spina bifida).  To combat this, we treat him as if he already has the allergy (without panic if something latex happens to touch him).  We've learned to be on the alert for the innocent-looking-but- evil-latex-lurking-in-the-shadows--or, you know, just making sure we avoid latex where possible.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Latex free (as per websites or contact with customer service representatives):&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Member's Mark Diapers, from Sam's Club&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;White Cloud Supreme Diapers, from Wal-Mart&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Parent's Choice Diapers, from Wal-Mart&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Kids II toys&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Schleich animal toys &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Bumbo chairs&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Nuk oral massager&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;Not latex free:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;chewing gum&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Koosh balls&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;non-Mylar balloons&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;Good information to have about latex:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethylene-vinyl_acetate"&gt;EVA&lt;/a&gt; foam doesn't have natural rubber latex--even though it sometimes is called "foam rubber"&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;"In rare instances, people who are allergic to latex may also react to rubber bands, erasers, rubber parts of toys, various rubber components in medical devices, rubber elastic in clothes, or feeding nipples and pacifiers. Products molded from hard, crepe rubber, such as soles of shoes, are unlikely to cause reactions. Almost all latex paints are not a problem since they do not contain natural rubber latex." &lt;a href="http://www.aaaai.org/patients/publicedmat/tips/latexallergy.stm"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;from AAAAI&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.latexallergyresources.org/ResourceManual/Section1/consumerProducts.cfm"&gt;American Latex Allergy Association lists&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;</description><link>http://www.lavalane.org/scratch/2007/10/diapers-and-latex.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Keryn)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37782502.post-1662069237446016447</guid><pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 03:38:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-09-23T21:41:57.092-06:00</atom:updated><title>Of Mice and Mormons: Religion in Higher Ed</title><description>A scary tale of religious and social discrimination against a Latter-day Saint student in higher education. A seven part series, with all seven parts linked here for convenience. By Mike S. Adams at Townhall.com.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Part &lt;a href="http://www.townhall.com/columnists/MikeSAdams/2007/08/27/of_mice_and_mormons"&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.townhall.com/columnists/MikeSAdams/2007/08/28/of_mice_and_mormons,_part_ii"&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.townhall.com/columnists/MikeSAdams/2007/08/29/of_mice_and_mormons_iii"&gt;3&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.townhall.com/columnists/MikeSAdams/2007/08/30/of_mice_and_mormons,_part_iv"&gt;4&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.townhall.com/columnists/MikeSAdams/2007/08/31/of_mice_and_mormons,_part_v"&gt;5&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.townhall.com/columnists/MikeSAdams/2007/09/04/of_mice_and_mormons,_part_vi"&gt;6&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.townhall.com/columnists/MikeSAdams/2007/09/05/of_mice_and_mormons,_part_vii_the_conclusion"&gt;7&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://www.lavalane.org/scratch/2007/09/of-mice-and-mormons-religion-in-higher.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Bradley Ross)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37782502.post-2959427490516379504</guid><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 01:12:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-09-19T19:20:14.224-06:00</atom:updated><title>Arbinger Books</title><description>A few of the Arbinger Institute books have been published serially in Meridian magazine and are available there.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.meridianmagazine.com/books/011005bonds.html"&gt;Bonds That Make Us Free: Healing Our Relationships, Coming to Ourselves&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.meridianmagazine.com/books/041126PeacegiverEpilogue.html"&gt;The Peacegiver&lt;/a&gt; (That is a link to the end of the book which has links to all the earlier chapters.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.meridianmagazine.com/books/070212anatomy24.html"&gt;The Anatomy of Peace&lt;/a&gt; (Again, this is the last chapter.)</description><link>http://www.lavalane.org/scratch/2007/09/arbinger-books.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Bradley Ross)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37782502.post-343883985269500644</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 03:56:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-08-21T22:01:46.318-06:00</atom:updated><title>Global Warming roundup 8/07</title><description>In an interesting exchange on Steve U.'s blog, a commenter left a huge comment that really articulated well some of my feelings on the climate change issues. First, one commenter &lt;a href="http://steveu.com/blog/2007/08/global-warming-facts.html#688353560908583491"&gt;wrote&lt;/a&gt;, "There is one major fact about the global warming debate: no one debates the dirty air, water, and land created by greenhouse gases. If we are not the worst air quality in the nation, we are close to it."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That person made the mistake of confusing greenhouse gases with pollutants. Here is a snatch from &lt;a href="http://steveu.com/blog/2007/08/global-warming-facts.html#3727232452493049661"&gt;the huge rebuttal&lt;/a&gt; that I really liked.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;CO2 is NOT an "air pollutant" in the sense that carbon monoxide and particulates are. It is a trace element in the atmosphere. All animals (including people) generate high concentrations of it when they breathe. All carbon in plants and trees (including the food we eat) comes from this thin reservoir of CO2 in the atmosphere! All the carbon in carbohydrates was taken from the air by plants. Thus, CO2 is literally the basis of all life on earth. When we add a marginal amount to the atmosphere, we are adding the stuff that plants and animals are made of. It is the source of carbon that rains into the oceans and allows calcium carbonate to be turned into the shells of marine creatures and coral reefs.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The rest of that comment by Raymond Takashi Swenson was equally good.</description><link>http://www.lavalane.org/scratch/2007/08/global-warming-roundup-807.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Bradley Ross)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37782502.post-37471647477692877</guid><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 21:07:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-06-22T15:10:45.867-06:00</atom:updated><title>Sun Spots, Schwabe Cycles, and Global Cooling</title><description>From the Financial Post, &lt;a href="http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/financialpost/comment/story.html?id=597d0677-2a05-47b4-b34f-b84068db11f4&amp;amp;p=4"&gt;R. Timothy Patterson's article "Read the Sunspots"&lt;/a&gt;:  &lt;blockquote&gt;Solar scientists predict that, by 2020, the sun will be starting into its weakest Schwabe solar cycle of the past two centuries, likely leading to unusually cool conditions on Earth. Beginning to plan for adaptation to such a cool period, one which may continue well beyond one 11-year cycle, as did the Little Ice Age, should be a priority for governments. It is global cooling, not warming, that is the major climate threat to the world, especially Canada. As a country at the northern limit to agriculture in the world, it would take very little cooling to destroy much of our food crops, while a warming would only require that we adopt farming techniques practiced to the south of us.&lt;br /&gt;Meantime, we need to continue research into this, the most complex field of science ever tackled, and immediately halt wasted expenditures on the King Canute-like task of "stopping climate change."&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><link>http://www.lavalane.org/scratch/2007/06/sun-spots-schwabe-cycles-and-global.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Keryn)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37782502.post-282686404494161964</guid><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 03:05:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-06-19T21:07:59.463-06:00</atom:updated><title>Why the government shouldn't do health care...</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/opinion/columns/article_1731443.php"&gt;Mark Steyn says&lt;/a&gt;:  &lt;blockquote&gt;There are immigration laws on the books right now, aren't there? Why not try enforcing them? The same people who say that government is a mighty power for good that can extinguish every cigarette butt and detoxify every cheeseburger and even change the very climate of the planet back to some Edenic state so that the water that falleth from heaven will land as ice and snow, and polar bears on distant continents will frolic as they did in days of yore, the very same people say: Building a border fence? Enforcing deportation orders? Can't be done, old boy. Pie-in-the-sky.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><link>http://www.lavalane.org/scratch/2007/06/why-government-shouldnt-do-health-care.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Keryn)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37782502.post-8610913420187534367</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:31:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-03-15T14:35:40.586-06:00</atom:updated><title>Hero Hypocrisy</title><description>We haven't seen a lot of TIME or Newsweek cover stories about the heroics of our soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan. &lt;a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YTIxMzVhZGZjYjkxOWVlODE5OTA0YjAzYzczOWI0OTU="&gt;Thomas Sowell points out&lt;/a&gt; the insincerity of calling our soldiers "heroes" only when we are painting them as victims.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="drop"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;span class="drop"&gt;T&lt;/span&gt;he front cover of &lt;em&gt;Newsweek&lt;/em&gt;’s March 5th issue featured a woman with amputated legs and a sweatshirt that said “ARMY” across the front. Inside, there were pages and pages of other pictures of badly wounded and disfigured military veterans, in a long article that began under the big headline: “Forgotten Heroes.”&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The utter hypocrisy of all this can be seen in the word “heroes.” There have been many acts of heroism among our troops in Iraq — but those heroes didn’t make the front cover of &lt;em&gt;Newsweek&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One man fell on a grenade to protect his buddies, smothering the fatal blast with his body, so that those around him might live when he died. But that never made the front cover of &lt;em&gt;Newsweek&lt;/em&gt;. It was barely mentioned anywhere in the liberal media.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;They are not interested in heroes. They are interested in depicting victims — in the military as in civilian society.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><link>http://www.lavalane.org/scratch/2007/03/hero-hypocrisy.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Bradley Ross)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37782502.post-7922222482392502683</guid><pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-03-22T21:47:22.853-06:00</atom:updated><title>Global warming roundup 03/07</title><description>"&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XttV2C6B8pU"&gt;The Great Global Warming Hoax&lt;/a&gt;" shown on Channel 4 in Britian (opens in  YouTube)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2007/03/a_tale_of_two_markets.cfm"&gt;A tale of two markets&lt;/a&gt; on the &lt;a href="http://www2.blogger.com/www.economist.com"&gt;Economist.com&lt;/a&gt;, about carbon offsets &lt;blockquote&gt;You are a carbon-emitting American, currently purchasing Q quantity of carbon-emitting electricity in your home market, which we'll call Market #1.  You want to consume more electricity, but you worry about global warming.  So you buy electricity in your local market, but offset this purchase by paying someone to build the equivalent generating power in windfarms in another market.&lt;br /&gt;In your home market, your purchases are sending a signal:  build more (dirty) power. You have shifted the demand curve outwards, so that at any given price, more power is consumed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;I guess I was too optimistic about the &lt;a href="rtsp://video.c-span.org/project/energy/energy032107_gore.rm"&gt;Senate&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="rtsp://video.c-span.org/project/energy/energy032107_climate.rm"&gt;House&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="rtsp://video.c-span.org/project/energy/energy032107_climate2.rm"&gt;hearings&lt;/a&gt; (opens in RealPlayer) on global warming on March 21--I honestly thought that the congressmen (both Republican and Democrat) would ask meaningful, intelligent questions, that they would &lt;a href="http://planetgore.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YWZhZWNhM2IzMDBmZGU2MTBmMWMxM2I1MWZhNDg2Yzc="&gt;attend the entire hearings&lt;/a&gt;, that they would &lt;a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZmVlZWU4ZTEyN2M0NTJhODc0M2YyYjUyNDU1ZTkxM2I="&gt;be polite&lt;/a&gt;, etc, etc.  Just goes to show that I'm awfully naive about our government.  Anyway, here's some more coverage:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Iain Murray "&lt;a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/03222007/postopinion/opedcolumnists/als_warming_lies_opedcolumnists_iain_murray.htm"&gt;Al's Warming Lies and the Real "Inconvenient Truth&lt;/a&gt;"&lt;br /&gt;John Podhortez "&lt;a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/03222007/news/columnists/al_mighty_preacher_running_out_of_power_columnists_john_podhoretz.htm"&gt;Al Mighty Preacher Running out of Power&lt;/a&gt;"&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.plnewsforum.com/index.php?/forums/viewthread/16909/"&gt;Live-blogging the hearings&lt;/a&gt; at Powerline forums&lt;br /&gt;"&lt;a href="rtsp://video.c-span.org/15days/e031607_environment.rm"&gt;Cooler Heads&lt;/a&gt;" briefing on "An Inconvenient Truth"</description><link>http://www.lavalane.org/scratch/2007/03/global-warming-roundup-0307.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Keryn)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37782502.post-948395618612287383</guid><pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 03:05:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-02-16T20:14:08.947-07:00</atom:updated><title>Joe Wilson File</title><description>&lt;a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NTEwNDc0MzdjYmU2OTk4MjM2MmQ2Njc4MzYyMDhmMjI="&gt;Mona Charen article at National Review&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;The prosecutor accepted Joe Wilson’s “retaliation” theory from the start, looking for a White House conspiracy to harm Wilson. Fitzgerald tamely followed this line despite learning later that Wilson lied about how he was chosen for the mission to Niger (contrary to Wilson’s hot denials, it was his wife’s suggestion according to a Senate Intelligence Committee report), lied about what he found there (his report actually tended to confirm not deny Iraq’s uranium shopping), and lied about discrediting certain forged documents (they did not even appear until months after Wilson’s trip). Yet Wilson’s word was good enough for Fitzgerald.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><link>http://www.lavalane.org/scratch/2007/02/joe-wilson-file.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Bradley Ross)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37782502.post-4163964587580330924</guid><pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 03:47:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-02-28T17:46:58.735-07:00</atom:updated><title>Global warming roundup 02/07</title><description>Jonah Goldberg main column "&lt;a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MmJiZDEyYzkxYWE0OWYxMWY4Y2ZjYzI2YmNmOGExMDE="&gt;Global Cooling is Too Expensive&lt;/a&gt;"&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MWI3YmNiOGUzMjk5MDc1NDRmMThlN2Y1MjEwNDZjNDA="&gt;Europe's emissions vs United States&lt;/a&gt;' by Iain Murray&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.melaniephillips.com/diary/?p=1457"&gt;Dirty work at the green crossroads&lt;/a&gt; by Melanie Phillips&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110009625"&gt;Climate of Opinion&lt;/a&gt; WSJ Editorial&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZjI4MDIzYzkyYmUyYWJkM2Q3ZjEzNTg1YzZiNWY1MjE="&gt;A mine is a Terrible Thing to Waste&lt;/a&gt; by Peter Suderman&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ODVlZGY5MTM0YmE3OTc5YmY0YjQ1ZTdlOWQ5NWI1NWY="&gt;The Church of Climate Panic&lt;/a&gt; by Rich Lowry&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/consumer/caring/article.html?in_article_id=416353&amp;amp;in_page_id=511"&gt;A Carbon Cop-out&lt;/a&gt; by Michael Hanlon&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MjgwOWEzMTUwMzc4N2U3MmFhZTdlMmJlNTQ3Nzk0NzQ="&gt;It's the Science, Stupid&lt;/a&gt; by Thomas Sowell&lt;br /&gt;NRO's new blog, &lt;a href="http://planetgore.nationalreview.com/"&gt;Planet Gore&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NWU0ZDQzOTkzYWZiMGQ5NjM4Y2ViYThlMDJmYzE1NWY="&gt;Ah...Bad Doomsday Predictions&lt;/a&gt; by Jonah Goldberg&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YWI0YjI3NmJkZGZjMDgwMjM1MGJkYWQ2MWFkNTAyMDA="&gt;Sydney Residents Wake to Laughingstock&lt;/a&gt; by Mark Steyn&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YWI0YjI3NmJkZGZjMDgwMjM1MGJkYWQ2MWFkNTAyMDA="&gt;An experiment that hints we are wrong about climate change&lt;/a&gt; in the London Times Online&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ecotality.com/blog/?p=350"&gt;Carbon offsets&lt;/a&gt; on Ecotality&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;plus some older ones:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cei.org/pages/ait_response.cfm"&gt;Competitive Enterprise Institute debunking &lt;/a&gt;"An Inconvenient Truth"&lt;br /&gt;Iain Murray on &lt;a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YmFiZDAyMWFhMGIxNTgwNGIyMjVkZjQ4OGFiZjFlNjc="&gt;"An Inconvenient Truth"&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://www.lavalane.org/scratch/2007/02/global-warming-roundup-0207.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Keryn)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37782502.post-2181157204370416938</guid><pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 03:43:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-02-05T22:20:19.378-07:00</atom:updated><title>You can only give us money if you...</title><description>Victor Davis Hanson has an &lt;a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MjYyNjE5NzY5MGMyYTVkZjUxOWVmNTBmMjQ1Zjg1MjY="&gt;insightful pos&lt;/a&gt;t about the attitude of the current Palestinian government on Western aid.  The whole thing is incredible (in that I have a hard time believing it is even possible), but here's a key paragraph:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;What has America done to suggest to a terrorist organization that it has an inherent right to American taxpayer money because it has found a way to market or soft-peddle its intention to destroy a democracy? The money quote of Hamas is the key phrase "they cannot..." Only in the Middle East does the recipient announce to the benefactor the conditions of the hand out.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><link>http://www.lavalane.org/scratch/2007/02/you-can-only-give-us-money-if-you.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Keryn)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37782502.post-8919490810190208128</guid><pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 04:52:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-02-05T22:20:13.351-07:00</atom:updated><title>Frustrations of a climate geologist</title><description>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;John Marchese from the Philadelphia Magazine interviews a geology professor in &lt;a href="http://phillymag.com/articles/science_al_gore_is_a_greenhouse_gasbag"&gt;Al Gore is a Greenhouse Gasbag&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;When Gieg gets to this point in his argument, as he often does when talking about global warming, he gets a little frustrated. “I always get sidetracked because, first of all, the science isn’t good. Second, there are all these other interpretations for what we see. Third, it doesn’t make any difference, and fourth, it’s distracting us from environmental problems that really matter.” Among those, Gieg says, are the millions of people a year who die from smoking and two million people a year who die because they don’t have access to clean water.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Another interesting, but less persuasive article on the same subject ran in &lt;a href="http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/global-warming020507.htm"&gt;Canada Free Press&lt;/a&gt;.</description><link>http://www.lavalane.org/scratch/2007/02/frustrations-of-climate-geologist.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Keryn)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37782502.post-2125756094225205265</guid><pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 13:24:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-02-05T06:50:32.475-07:00</atom:updated><title>Teacher Pay</title><description>An OpnionJournal piece cites some interesting stats from the Bureau of Labor Statistics about &lt;a href="http://opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110009612"&gt;pay for public school teachers&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, public school teachers earned $34.06 per hour in 2005, 36% more than the hourly wage of the average white-collar worker and 11% more than the average professional specialty or technical worker.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Of course, public school teacher earnings look less impressive when viewed on an annual basis than on an hourly basis. This is because teachers tend to work fewer hours per year.... That time off is worth money and cannot simply be ignored when comparing earnings. The appropriate way to compare earnings in this circumstance is to focus on hourly rates.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While these stats sound interesting, I was unable to reproduce them myself on the BLS website. You can &lt;a href="http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/outside.jsp?survey=nc"&gt;try your hand too&lt;/a&gt;, if you like. That site requires Java to be installed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to my search, "Teachers, except college and universities" make $31.51/hr. Still, the number is reasonably close.</description><link>http://www.lavalane.org/scratch/2007/02/teacher-pay.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Bradley Ross)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37782502.post-7199681076418451461</guid><pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-02-05T07:37:20.935-07:00</atom:updated><title>My Favorite Internet TV channels</title><description>Here are a few sources for online video that I like to watch.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://byu.tv/"&gt;BYU-TV&lt;/a&gt; - Religious programming for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Annenburg specials at &lt;a href="http://learner.org/view_programs/view.programs.html"&gt;learner.org&lt;/a&gt; - Tons of TV documentaries for education use. Of course, they are lots of fun for self-edification as well!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.pbs.org/"&gt;PBS&lt;/a&gt; has some video online for several of their specials. Usually, these are just supporting clips, but sometimes the whole program is available for online viewing. For example, they have a cool &lt;a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/programs/index.html"&gt;NOVA &lt;/a&gt;documentary about string theory called &lt;a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/"&gt;The Elegant Universe&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ideachannel.tv/"&gt;http://www.ideachannel.tv/&lt;/a&gt; - with economics videos from Milton Friedman. They also have the biographical special about Friedman's life.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=wgbh"&gt;WGBH on Google&lt;/a&gt; - They have put a bunch of their documentaries up there, including some cool ones about the ancient world. Some of the documentaries are NOVA documentaries that don't seem to be available at PBS.org above.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://television.aol.com/in2tv"&gt;AOL In2TV&lt;/a&gt; has some fun old programs available online, like Gilligan's Island and the Flinstones.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://abc.go.com/"&gt;ABC&lt;/a&gt; puts up full episodes of some of their popular prime-time programming. They don't stay there forever, so you have to watch them while they are around.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://nbc.com/video/rewind"&gt;NBC Rewind&lt;/a&gt; features full episodes of a few of the current shows and 2 minute recaps of other recent shows.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.comcast.net/comcast.html"&gt;Comcast Fan&lt;/a&gt; isn't a huge favorite, but sometimes I'll browse it for little news clips from recent events. I don't know if you have to be a Comcast subscriber to be able to see this one.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lds.org/videos/"&gt;LDS.org&lt;/a&gt; has recently started putting up video on their website. Only one video is there as of this writing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;</description><link>http://www.lavalane.org/scratch/2007/02/my-favorite-internet-tv-channels.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Bradley Ross)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37782502.post-2382112355366901043</guid><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 23:21:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-01-26T16:25:22.976-07:00</atom:updated><title>Race in America</title><description>Shelby Steele wrote a fabulous piece at OpinionJournal.com about &lt;a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110004295"&gt;racial politics&lt;/a&gt; in America.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Racial identity is simply forbidden to whites in America and across the entire Western world. Black children today are hammered with the idea of racial identity and pride, yet racial pride in whites constitutes a grave evil. Say "I'm white and I'm proud" and you are a Nazi.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;The underlying irony here is that white guilt has given America a liberalism that revives as virtue the precise moral formula at the core of fascism: power justified by race alone. Today a wealthy black will be preferred over the son of a white mailman at all of America's best universities. This of course is illiberalism of the same sort that segregation was.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Classic liberalism (today's conservatism) sees atavistic power as illegitimate because it always steps on individual freedom. The mailman's son is not free if his race is held against him. But the problem with classic liberalism is that there is no room in it for white redemption.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><link>http://www.lavalane.org/scratch/2007/01/race-in-america.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Bradley Ross)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37782502.post-3181232880598436381</guid><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 21:29:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-01-21T14:32:31.257-07:00</atom:updated><title>Fewer People Should Go To College</title><description>That is the conclusion of Charles Murray in &lt;a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110009535"&gt;this piece&lt;/a&gt; for the Wall Street Journal.  The following sums up the most persuasive part of the article for me.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;For a few occupations, a college degree still certifies a qualification. For example, employers appropriately treat a bachelor's degree in engineering as a requirement for hiring engineers. But a bachelor's degree in a field such as sociology, psychology, economics, history or literature certifies nothing. It is a screening device for employers. The college you got into says a lot about your ability, and that you stuck it out for four years says something about your perseverance. But the degree itself does not qualify the graduate for anything. There are better, faster and more efficient ways for young people to acquire credentials to provide to employers.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><link>http://www.lavalane.org/scratch/2007/01/fewer-people-should-go-to-college.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Bradley Ross)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37782502.post-2750307897305038344</guid><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 05:10:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-01-13T22:12:04.507-07:00</atom:updated><title>Single payer vs health insurance</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.economist.com/debate/freeexchange/2007/01/crosscountry_perceptions.cfm"&gt;An interesting article in the Economist&lt;/a&gt; discusses why Canadians and Britons love their system of health insurance, and why Americans love ours.</description><link>http://www.lavalane.org/scratch/2007/01/single-payer-vs-health-insurance.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Keryn)</author></item></channel></rss>